The Livox Mid-360 has been the default choice for 3D LiDAR on mobile robots since 2023. Now there are two new options worth your attention: the Mid-360S (Livox's 2025 upgrade) and the Tantu M360 (a third-party alternative with unique capabilities). This article compares all three head-to-head to help you make the right choice.

Full Specification Comparison

ParameterTantu M360Livox Mid-360Livox Mid-360S
Scan TypeMirror-spinning (non-repetitive)Hybrid solid-state (non-repetitive)Hybrid solid-state (non-repetitive)
Wavelength905nm905nm905nm
Range (10% reflectivity)25m40m~40m
Range (80% reflectivity)50m70m~70m
Blind Zone5cm10cmImproved
Horizontal FOV360°360°360°
Vertical FOV70° (-10°~+60°)59°Larger (check livoxtech.com)
Point Cloud Rate200kHz200kHz200kHz+
Return ModeSingle / Dual (M360-D)SingleSingle
IP RatingIP67IP67IP67
Power Consumption<4.5W6.5WOptimized
Input Voltage12-32V DC9-27V DC9-27V DC
Built-in IMU6-axis (IIM42652)ICM40609Improved (check livoxtech.com)
Time SyncPTP v2 / GPS (reserved)PTP v2 / GPSPTP v2 / GPS
Operating Temp-10°C ~ +60°C-20°C ~ +55°C-20°C ~ +55°C
Rated Lifespan≥10,000 hoursNot publishedNot published
Rain/Fog DetectionYesNoNo
Angular Error≤0.18°≤0.15°Improved
Weight408g265gLighter
Dimensions78×78×81mm65×65×60mmMore compact
SDK / ROSLivox SDK2 compatibleNative Livox SDK2 + ROSNative Livox SDK2 + ROS
Official PriceContact SmartB$749+$799+

What's New with the Mid-360S?

Livox launched the Mid-360S in 2025 to address pain points that AMR engineers encountered with the original Mid-360 in real-world deployments. Key improvements include:

If you're already in the Livox ecosystem and buying new, the S version is the logical choice. But if you need dual-return echo, 5cm blind zone, or 12-32V wide voltage, the M360 offers capabilities that neither Livox product provides.

Where Each Product Wins

Tantu M360 Wins On:

Livox Mid-360/Mid-360S Win On:

Scenario-Based Recommendations

🏭 Factory / Warehouse AGV

→ Tantu M360. The combination of 5cm blind zone (shelf navigation), IP67 (dust), <4.5W (long shifts), and 12-32V (standard AGV batteries) makes it the best fit. See detailed comparison.

🚛 Outdoor Logistics Robot

→ Tantu M360-D for rain/fog environments. → Livox Mid-360S for longer detection range in mostly dry conditions.

🤖 Indoor Service / Delivery Robot

→ Livox Mid-360S. Lightest, smallest, best ecosystem. The 40m range and small form factor are ideal for indoor environments.

🔬 Research / Prototyping

→ Livox Mid-360 or Mid-360S. The largest community means more tutorial content, GitHub examples, and troubleshooting resources. Essential for fast prototyping.

🏗️ Construction / Heavy Industrial

→ Tantu M360. ≥10,000h rated lifespan, 70° FOV for comprehensive 3D coverage, dual-return for glass/dust penetration, wide voltage for various power systems.

🧊 Cold Storage / Freezer Operations

→ Livox Mid-360 or Mid-360S. -20°C low-temp support where M360 only handles -10°C.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the Mid-360S worth the extra cost over the original Mid-360?

If you're buying new, yes. The S version addresses real deployment issues (precision consistency, reliability). The price premium is modest. However, if your existing Mid-360s are working fine, upgrading isn't necessary.

Can the M360 use Livox's ROS drivers?

Yes, the M360 is compatible with the Livox SDK2 protocol and works with livox_ros_driver2. Configuration adjustments are typically needed.

Is dual-return echo really useful?

In dry indoor environments, not particularly. But for any outdoor operation where rain, fog, or light snow is possible, dual-return provides measurably cleaner point clouds and fewer false obstacle detections.

Why doesn't Livox offer dual-return?

Livox's hybrid solid-state architecture uses a unique non-repetitive scanning pattern. Adding dual-return would likely require significant hardware changes. The M360's mirror-spinning architecture is more naturally compatible with multi-return detection.

Which sensor has the best long-term support track record?

Livox, by far. They've been shipping LiDAR since 2019 and have the most established support infrastructure. The M360 is newer and its long-term support depends on Tantu SmartB's commitment. That said, the M360's Livox SDK2 compatibility provides a fallback.

What about the M360's GPS time sync being "reserved"?

The M360 hardware includes GPS interface capability, but the firmware feature is currently in reserve and not yet enabled. If GPS synchronization is critical for your application, the Livox products have it available now.

Can I replace a Mid-360 with an M360 without changing my software?

In most cases, yes. Since the M360 is compatible with Livox SDK2, your ROS nodes (FAST-LIO2, LIO-SAM, etc.) should work with configuration changes (IP address, scan parameters). However, thoroughly test before deploying.